Checklist

Ethical Engagement Self-Assessment

Evaluate your practices against ethical standards for engaging with Indigenous cultural heritage

This self-assessment tool helps brands, institutions, researchers, and other organisations evaluate their engagement with Indigenous cultural heritage against ethical standards. Work through each section honestly, answering based on your current practices.

This checklist can be printed for internal review or used as a starting point for improving your organisation's approach to Indigenous cultural heritage.

Knowledge and Recognition

Understanding whose heritage you are engaging with

1.1 Community Identification

We have identified the specific Indigenous community or communities whose cultural heritage we are using or wish to use, including their name, location, and cultural context.

1.2 Cultural Context

We understand the cultural significance, history, and meaning of the cultural elements we wish to use, including any restrictions or protocols around their use.

1.3 Ownership Recognition

We recognise that Indigenous communities are the rightful owners and custodians of their cultural heritage, and that this ownership is collective and intergenerational.

1.4 Distinction Between Communities

We understand that different Indigenous communities have distinct cultural heritages and do not conflate or generalise across communities.

Consent

How consent was obtained

2.1 Prior Contact

We contacted the relevant community before beginning any work with their cultural heritage, not after.

2.2 Appropriate Representatives

We engaged with authorised community representatives, not just individual artisans or sellers, respecting the community's governance structures.

2.3 Full Disclosure

We provided the community with complete information about our intended use, including commercial purposes, scale, duration, and potential impacts.

2.4 Adequate Time

We allowed the community adequate time to consider our proposal and make decisions according to their own processes, without imposing artificial deadlines.

2.5 Voluntary Agreement

The community's consent was given freely, without pressure, coercion, or inducements that could compromise their free choice.

2.6 Documentation

We have documented consent in writing, with clear terms, signed by authorised community representatives.

2.7 Scope Limitations

We understand that consent is limited to the specific purposes agreed, and we do not extend it to other uses without additional consultation.

Attribution

How you acknowledge community heritage

3.1 Specific Attribution

We attribute cultural heritage to the specific community of origin (e.g., "Angami Naga" not just "tribal" or "Northeast Indian").

3.2 Visible Attribution

Attribution is prominently displayed on products, in marketing materials, exhibitions, and publications — not hidden in fine print.

3.3 Accurate Information

All information provided about the cultural heritage — its meaning, history, and significance — has been verified with the community.

3.4 Artisan Credit

Where individual artisans have contributed, they are credited by name (with their consent) and their skill is acknowledged.

3.5 Distinction of Interpretations

We clearly distinguish between authentic traditional work and contemporary interpretations or adaptations inspired by traditional heritage.

Benefit-Sharing

How communities benefit from your engagement

4.1 Financial Benefits

We have established fair financial benefit-sharing arrangements (royalties, licensing fees, profit-sharing, or other compensation) with the community.

4.2 Non-Monetary Benefits

We provide non-monetary benefits such as capacity building, training, market access, or documentation support.

4.3 Fair Pricing

If purchasing directly from artisans, we pay fair prices that reflect the true value of their skill, time, and cultural knowledge.

4.4 Community-Level Benefits

Benefits flow to the community as a whole, not just to a few individuals, supporting community development or cultural preservation.

4.5 Proportionate Benefits

The benefits to the community are proportionate to the value we derive from using their cultural heritage.

Cultural Integrity

Respecting the meaning and significance of cultural heritage

5.1 Respectful Representation

Our use of cultural heritage is respectful and does not trivialise, mock, or diminish its significance.

5.2 No Sacred Misuse

We do not use sacred, ceremonial, or restricted cultural elements in inappropriate commercial or casual contexts.

5.3 No Distortion

We do not alter, combine, or decontextualise cultural elements in ways that misrepresent their meaning or origin.

5.4 No Stereotyping

Our representation avoids stereotypes, exoticisation, or framing that reinforces harmful narratives about Indigenous peoples.

5.5 Community Review

We have invited the community to review and approve how their heritage is represented before public release.

Ongoing Relationship

Maintaining accountability beyond initial engagement

6.1 Continued Communication

We maintain ongoing communication with the community, providing updates on how their heritage is being used.

6.2 Sharing Outputs

We share copies of products, publications, or other outputs with the community.

6.3 Grievance Mechanism

We have established a clear mechanism for communities to raise concerns, complaints, or grievances about our use of their heritage.

6.4 Withdrawal Rights

We respect the community's right to modify or withdraw consent, and have processes to respond appropriately if this occurs.

6.5 Periodic Review

We conduct periodic reviews of our engagement to ensure continued alignment with ethical standards and community expectations.

How Did You Score?

Count the items you checked. There are 31 items in total.

28-31 Items: Excellent

Your practices demonstrate strong ethical engagement. Continue to maintain these standards and consider how you can support others in the industry.

22-27 Items: Good Progress

You have many good practices in place. Review unchecked items and develop plans to address gaps.

15-21 Items: Needs Improvement

There are significant gaps in your ethical engagement. Prioritise unchecked items and consider seeking guidance from NECIK.

Below 15 Items: Urgent Action Required

Your current practices may cause harm to Indigenous communities. Pause activities and seek consultation before proceeding.

If you identified gaps in your practices, NECIK can help you develop improved approaches to ethical engagement with Indigenous cultural heritage.

Request Consultation Back to Frameworks